Chen et al. (2004): Autism, MMR and Population Trends

What was this study trying to examine?

This study examined whether trends in autism diagnoses over time were associated with changes in MMR vaccination rates or exposure to measles virus.

Rather than comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals, the researchers analysed population-level trends in autism diagnoses and MMR uptake.

How was the study designed?

The researchers used an ecological time-trend design. They examined autism diagnosis rates across different birth cohorts and time periods and compared these trends with:

• MMR vaccination coverage

• measles infection rates

• changes in vaccination policy

The analysis was based on population data rather than individual medical records.

What question were they testing?

The underlying question was whether increases in autism diagnoses followed patterns that would be expected if MMR vaccination or measles virus exposure were a contributing factor.

If MMR or measles virus played a major role, changes in vaccination coverage or infection rates would be expected to coincide with changes in autism trends.

What did the study find?

The researchers reported that autism diagnoses continued to increase even during periods when:

• MMR vaccination rates were stable or declining

• measles infection rates were very low

They found no temporal pattern suggesting that changes in MMR vaccination or measles exposure explained the observed increase in autism diagnoses.

How did the authors interpret these findings?

The authors concluded that population-level trends did not support a link between autism, MMR vaccination, or measles virus.

They argued that the rise in autism diagnoses was more consistent with changes in diagnostic practices and awareness than with vaccination patterns.

Key context to keep in mind

Because this study used population-level data, it cannot assess individual risk or susceptibility. Its conclusions apply to overall trends, not to individual outcomes.

---